南京大学研究生毕业论文中文摘要首页用纸
毕业论文题目: MTO模式VsCTO模式:基干F公司T项目的比较研究
MB A 专业 0 9秋 级
硕士生姓名: 熊玲
指导教师(姓名、职称):宋哲副教授
(以下正文)
EMS (电子制造服务)欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司从幵始之初到目前己走过三十几年的历史,从最初
的劳动密集型制造欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司发展到今天的技术密集型制造欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司,EMS欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司中的领先者已不再
只是参与印刷电路板的批量制造(MT0模式),而是逐步进入到复杂的整机制造CT0模
式。F公司T项目是国内EMS欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司中最早进入CT0制造模式并取得成功的项目之一,以
其产品的复杂度及典型的CT0制造模式,在欧亿·体育（中国）有限公司中具有极高的代表性。

从六年前T公司与F公司开始在中国的战略合作,T项目从最初从事最简单的
PCBA印刷电路板的制造业务开始,到特别复杂的PCBA印刷电路板、机械电子制造,到
最终进入特别复杂的整机按订单配置制造,此项目完成了从MTO(Manufacture To Order)
到CTO(Configure To Order)的转变。这是一个艰难而充满挑战的过程,在这期间本文
作者作为T项目的高级项目经理,与团队一起摸索并完成了客户需求管理、物料计划、
供应链管理、成本模式及生产管理等各方面需要完成的转变。

T项目在这个转变过程中开发的新的运营模式及成功经验可为别的EMS公司中
进入CT0制造模式的项目作为借鉴,同时还有一些正在摸索之中的未彻底解决的问题等
待更多的EMS专业人士的研究、学习和解决。本文的目的便是就T项目的MT0制造模式
与CT0制造模式进行比较研究,探索T项目在客户需求管理、物料计划、供应链管理、
成本模式及生产管理等方面可为别的项目借鉴的经验,并试图就其中待解决的问题提出
方案并作探讨。

关键词:电子制造服务,MTO,CTO,运营管理南京大学研究生毕业论文英文摘要首页用纸
THESIS: MTO Model Vs CTO Model: A Comparison Study on Project T of Company F
SPECIALIZATION: MBA
POSTGRADUATE: Ling Xiong
MENTOR: Zhe Song (Associate Profesor)
(以下正文)
Since it was started 30 years ago, EMS(Electronics
Manufacturing Service) industry has been developing itself from the
labor-intensive industry into technology-intensive industry gradually.
What's more is the leading companies within this industry are no longer
just involved in the volume manufacturing of PCBA(Printed Circuit
Boards Assembly) which is a MTO (Manufacturing to Order) model,
while they started getting hands on a more complex system level
manufacturing which is the CTO (Configure to Order) model. As one of
the earliest projects that got into CTO model successfully, Project Tof
company F stands up as a very typical project due to the complexity of
the products its manufacturing as well as the pure CTO model it's in.
The account started from the manufacturing of the simple
PCBAs 6 years ago when the companies T and F started their strategic
partnership in China. That was followed by the complex PCBA
manufacturing then the account moved into EM (Electro-mechanical)
manufacturing and that success finally won it the business of the
complex Configure To Order System Level integration. This whole
process has been full of challenges which involve a series of conversion
from MTO model to CTO model that includes but not limited to:
2